{"id":1073,"date":"2016-07-22T00:51:22","date_gmt":"2016-07-22T00:51:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/?p=1073"},"modified":"2016-07-22T00:51:22","modified_gmt":"2016-07-22T00:51:22","slug":"2-16-original","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-16-original\/","title":{"rendered":"2.16 n\u0101sato vidyate bh\u0101vo (Original)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><small>SrI:\u00a0 SrImathE SatakOpAya nama:\u00a0 SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama:\u00a0 SrImath varavaramunayE nama:<\/small><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/chapter-2-original\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chapter 2<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-15-original\/\">&lt;&lt; Chapter 2 verse 15<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-16\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Simple<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">n\u0101sato vidyate bh\u0101vo<br \/>\nn\u0101bh\u0101vo vidyate sata\u1e25<br \/>\nubhayor api d\u1e5b\u1e63\u1e6do \u2019ntas<br \/>\ntv anayos tattva-dar\u015bibhi\u1e25<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To the non-constant (<em>asat<\/em>=matter) fixity is not; to the constant (<em>sat<\/em>=spirit) non-fixity is not. To Truth-Seers are known, the essential natures of both.[1. R\u0101m\u0101nuja tells us that this verse has no allusion to the Sathk\u0101rya-v\u0101da of the S\u0101nkhy\u0101s (vide, S\u0101nkhya S\u016btra I-78). Yogi P\u0101rthas\u0101rathi writes: &#8216;What is here taught is, not the inconvertibility of nothing into a thing, but the inconvertibility of <em>one kind<\/em> of thing or category (viz., the ever mutable matter) into another <em>kind<\/em> of thing or category (viz., the ever immutable soul). &#8230;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Of that which is \u2018<em>asat<\/em>\u2019, or body, it cannot be predicated that it is \u2018<em>sat<\/em>\u2019. Of that which is \u2018<em>sat<\/em>\u2019 or spirit, it cannot be predicated that it is \u2018<em>asat<\/em>\u2019. To Seers of truth (or Sages), the ultimate natures (<em>anta<\/em>) of both these postulates are matters of their definite apprehension (or direct perceptual matters of observation)[2. This means that the essential or substantial natures of these super-sensuous categories are demonstrably or by observation, known to Sages. They are as certain knowledge to them as sense-knowledge to us.].<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><em>Anta<\/em> is literally the \u2018end\u2019. Here it means the \u2018end\u2019 of proof, or the conclusive end of a thing indicated. (So that the \u2018end\u2019 of <em>sat<\/em> and <em>asat<\/em> means their ultimate or essential natures).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The conclusion or certitude arrived at by Sages in this matter is that the nature of the non-sentient \u2018body\u2019, is \u2018<em>asat<\/em>\u2019 only (=inconstancy), and that the nature of the sentient \u2018<em>atma<\/em>\u2019 is \u2018<em>sat<\/em>\u2019 only (=constancy). <em>Asat<\/em> is thus that which is of the perishable character, and <em>sat<\/em> that which is of the imperishable character. Says Bhagav\u0101n Par\u0101\u015bara:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018O Twice-born (<em>dvija<\/em>)! There is therefore nothing, even a little, &#8211; that, in the number of things, can at any time be said to be (sat) with the exception of the intelligent (<em>vij\u00f1\u0101na-\u0101tm\u0101<\/em>)[3. Ibid; II-12, 45.].\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018(What has been told thee by me) is that <em>j\u00f1\u0101na<\/em> (=<em>\u0101tm\u0101<\/em>) is that which is (truth=<em>satyam<\/em>); everything else is that which is <em>not<\/em> (<em>asatyam<\/em>)[4. Ibid; II-14, 24.].\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018That which is indestructible is admitted by the wise to be the highest Truth (<em>param\u0101rtha<\/em>). But that which is derived by means of destructible things is doubtless destructible.\u2019[5. IBid; II-14, 24.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018What would you call <em>that<\/em>, O King!, <em>thing<\/em>?, which by changes, etc., effected by time, receives not different signs (names)?, what is <em>that<\/em>?\u2019[6. IBid; II-13, 100.]. And so on.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In Gita itself it is affirmed:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018These bodies have endings etc.,\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-18-original\/\">ii-18<\/a>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018But as for <em>that<\/em>, know it is indestructible.\u2019 (<a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-17-original\/\">ii-17<\/a>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hence it is clear that what are indicated by \u2018<em>satva<\/em>\u2019 and \u2018<em>a-satva<\/em>&#8216;) are these (viz., <em>\u0101tm\u0101<\/em> and body).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The context does not here admit of this verse having any reference to what is known as the <em>satk\u0101rya-v\u0101da<\/em>. For, the occasion indeed is one when K\u1e5bish\u1e47a has to explain to Arjuna &#8211; who is laboring under the delusion of not knowing the distinction between the natures of body and \u0101tm\u0101, &#8211; the perishability and the imperishability of these two (categories), in order to dispel that delusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It is to show this that the verse: \u2018As respects bodies or as respects <em>\u0101tm\u0101s<\/em> etc. (<a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-11-original\/\">ii-11<\/a>)\u2019 was begun. And it is to further elaborate the same (subject) that verses:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018But know that to be indestructible etc.\u2019 (<a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-17-original\/\">ii-17<\/a>),<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018These bodies have endings etc.,&#8217; (<a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-18-original\/\">ii-18<\/a>),<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">undertake.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But how is \u0101tm\u0101\u2019s (or the soul\u2019s) indestructibility known? This verse[7. Next verse 2.17.] tells us:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-17-original\/\">&gt;&gt; Chapter 2 verse 17<\/a><\/p>\n<p>archived in <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\">https:\/\/githa.koyil.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>pramEyam (goal) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/koyil.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">http:\/\/koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\npramANam (scriptures) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org\">http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\npramAthA (preceptors) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org\">http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\nSrIvaishNava education\/kids portal \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/pillai.koyil.org\/\">http:\/\/pillai.koyil.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SrI:\u00a0 SrImathE SatakOpAya nama:\u00a0 SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama:\u00a0 SrImath varavaramunayE nama: Chapter 2 &lt;&lt; Chapter 2 verse 15 Simple n\u0101sato vidyate bh\u0101vo n\u0101bh\u0101vo vidyate sata\u1e25 ubhayor api d\u1e5b\u1e63\u1e6do \u2019ntas tv anayos tattva-dar\u015bibhi\u1e25 To the non-constant (asat=matter) fixity is not; to the constant (sat=spirit) non-fixity is not. To Truth-Seers are known, the essential natures of both.[1. R\u0101m\u0101nuja &#8230; <a title=\"2.16 n\u0101sato vidyate bh\u0101vo (Original)\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-16-original\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about 2.16 n\u0101sato vidyate bh\u0101vo (Original)\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chapter-2","category-original"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}