{"id":5262,"date":"2017-08-04T23:42:23","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T23:42:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/?p=5262"},"modified":"2024-11-07T15:29:39","modified_gmt":"2024-11-07T15:29:39","slug":"13-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-2\/","title":{"rendered":"13.2 kshEthragyam chApi mAm vidhdhi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><small>SrI:\u00a0 SrImathE SatakOpAya nama:\u00a0 SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama:\u00a0 SrImath varavaramunayE nama:<\/small><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chapter 13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-1\">&lt;&lt; Chapter 13 verse 1<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>SlOkam \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-2-original\/\">Original<\/a><\/h3>\n<p><em>kshEthragyam chApi mAm vidhdhi sarvakshEthrEshu bhAratha |<\/em><br \/>\n<em> kshEthrakshEthragyayOr gyAna\u1e41 yath tath gyAnam matham mama ||<\/em><\/p>\n<h3>word-by-word meaning<\/h3>\n<p>bhAratha &#8211; Oh descendant of bharatha clan!<br \/>\nsarva kshEthrEshu &#8211; in all bodies (such as celestial, human etc)<br \/>\nkshEthragyam cha api &#8211; (as the body which is known as kshEthra) the AthmA which is known as kshEthragya too<br \/>\nmAm vidhdhi &#8211; know as having me as the antharyAmi<br \/>\nkshEthra kshEthragyayO: yath gyAnam &#8211; this knowledge which explains &#8220;the body and soul are different from each other, and both have me as their antharAthmA&#8221;<br \/>\nthath &#8211; that knowledge<br \/>\ngyAnam &#8211; knowledge (which is acceptable)<br \/>\nmama matham &#8211; this is my conclusion.<\/p>\n<h3>Simple Translation<\/h3>\n<p>Oh descendant of bharatha clan! Know me as the antharyAmi in all bodies (such as celestial, human etc which are known as kshEthra) and the AthmAs which are known as kshEthragya; this knowledge which explains &#8220;the body and soul are different from each other, and both have me as their antharAthmA&#8221;, that knowledge is considered as true knowledge (which is acceptable) &#8211; this is my conclusion.<\/p>\n<h3>Rendering based on ALkoNdavilli gOvindhAchArya swAmy\u2019s English translation of gIthA bhAshyam<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8216;Know Me, also, Bh\u0101rata! the Kshetraj\u00f1a in all the Kshetras. I deem <em>that<\/em> is knowledge, \u2014the knowledge of Kshetra and the Kshetraj\u00f1a.&#8217;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Know that the Kshetraj\u00f1a (soul) who in the capacity of cognizer abides in (or <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/vivify#Verb\">vivifies<\/a>) all the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/tenement#Noun\">tenements<\/a>, such as those of deva, man etc, is Mine, or is that which is ensouled by Me (<em>mad-\u0101tmakam<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From the adverb \u2018also\u2019 (<em>api<\/em>) in the expression, \u2018know me <em>also<\/em> the Kshetraj\u00f1a\u2019, it is justly inferable that \u2018Kshetra <em>also<\/em> is Mine\u2019. The purport is that in the same manner as Kshetra (body) is apprehended solely as the inseparable adjunct of Kshetra-j\u00f1a (soul), \u2014by the, Law of the Correlation of Subject and Predicate\u2014 so are both Kshetra and Kshetraj\u00f1a to be understood as inseparably adjectival to Me as relates, according to the same Law of subject-predicate co-inherence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It will be pointed out further on that Para-brahm \u2014 V\u0101sudeva\u2014 is a distinct Postulate of existence, from Kshetraj\u00f1a \u2014whether the latter belong to the condition of bondage or emancipation\u2014 or Postulate defined by the terms <em>Kshara<\/em> (the perishable=matter-bound souls) and <em>Akshara<\/em> (the imperishable=matter-freed souls); for it is stated:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Two-fold are the Purushas (=souls) in the world, the Kshara and the Akshara; Kshara is the sum of all existences; the constant (<em>k\u016btastha<\/em>) is called the Akshara.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/15-16-original\/\">XV-16<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018But the Best Purusha (Soul) is Another, Who is proclaimed as the Great Soul, Who, being Infinite and Sovereign, entering the triad of existences, sustains (it)\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/15-17-original\/\">XV-17<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Since I surpass the Kshara, and even excel the Akshara, I am reputed as Purushottama both in the world and in the Veda\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/15-18-original\/\">XV-18<\/a>) etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That Kshetra, the composite of (the elements) earth etc., and Kshetraj\u00f1a (souls) do qualitatively constitute the body of the Blessed Lord \u2014the Blessed Lord being their Soul\u2014 the \u015arutis such as the following declare:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who seated in the earth; Who is the Interior of the earth; Whom earth knows not; to Whom earth is body; Who in the inside of the earth rules\u2014, He is your Soul, Inner Ruler, Immortal\u2019[1. <em>B\u1e5bi Up\u00b0:<\/em> V-7-3: \u2018Ya\u1e25 p\u1e5bithi-vy\u0101m tish\u1e6dhan &amp;c\u2019.].<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who seated in the soul; Who is the Interior of the soul; Whom the soul knows not; to Whom the soul is body; Who in the inside of the soul rules; He is your Soul, Inner Ruler, Immortal\u2019.[2. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up\u00b0:<\/em> V-7-22: \u2018Ya \u0101tmani tish\u1e6dhan &amp;c.\u2019]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The reference to the Lord by the terms Kshetraj\u00f1a and so on is justified in accordance with the Law of correlation of subject and predicate signifying the abidance of the Lord as the Soul of all Kshetraj\u00f1as, internally ruling them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This Law of correlated reference was seen illustrated in all the stanzas, such as:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Of the \u0100dityas, I am Vish\u1e47u\u2019 etc., (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/10-21-original\/\">X-21<\/a>), intervening between the general statement to that effect made in the commencement in the stanza:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018I am \u0100tma, Gud\u0101ke\u015ba! enshrined in the hearts of all beings.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/10-20-original\/\">X-20<\/a>), and closing up as in such stanzas as:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Mutable or immutable, nothing exists that without Me can exist\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/10-39-original\/\">X-39<\/a>);<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Abiding therein, I am in the Kosmos with but a fraction (of Me).\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/10-42-original\/\">X-42<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I esteem that knowledge, then, as worth knowing <em>viz<\/em>, the knowledge concerning the distinction between Kshetra and Kshetraj\u00f1a; and the knowledge that I am their Soul.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Now, some interpret the passage: \u2018know the Kshetraj\u00f1a also as Me,\u2019 to establish unity (or identity) by the Rule of Common Reference. In that case, then, of having to postulate a unic existence, <em>viz<\/em>, \u012a\u015bvara, the fact that through, ignorance, He is in the position of a Kshetraj\u00f1a(=cognizer, implying duality, <em>viz:<\/em> cognizer and cognized), has to be acknowledged; and that the inculcation of identity is to dispel this ignorance. (The explanation is that) the ignorance due to the imagined (dual) condition as Kshetraj\u00f1a is dispelled by the precepts of such highly trusty elders as the Blessed Lord, just as by the precept of a trusty elder, teaching \u2018this is rope, not snake\u2019, the fancied notion of snake disappears.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Such (interpreters) have to be questioned thus:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Is <em>this<\/em> Teacher, the Blessed Lord V\u0101sudeva, the Supreme \u012a\u015bvara, One whose ignorance has disappeared by the realization effected of soul-reality?, or is He not such an One?<\/li>\n<li>If He be One Whose ignorance has disappeared on the dawning of soul-illumination, then to imagine that which is adjunct-less (<em>nirvi\u015besha<\/em>), and which is purely essentially <em>chit<\/em> (=consciousness) is to imagine a contrary reflection (<em>i.e.<\/em>, imagining a duality in an essential monity) which is objectionable, such as the existence of a duality like Kaunteya (=Arjuna) etc. In that case where too, is there any occasion for such a procedure as the imparting of instruction to them (Arjuna and so on)?<\/li>\n<li>If He is not admitted as such an One (read 2), then no soul-illumination has dawned on him, and therefore ignorance remains undispelled! Then because He is Himself <em>ignorant<\/em>, whence his fitness to impart soul-<em>knowledge<\/em>?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Is it not indeed stated elsewhere that:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The wise (<em>j\u00f1anis<\/em>) \u2014the seers of truth\u2014 shall teach you wisdom., etc (an explicit declaration of the truth of duality)? (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/4-34-original\/\">IV-34<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hence, all polemics of this nature, opposed as they are to all \u015arutis and Sm\u1e5bitis, Itih\u0101sas and Pur\u0101\u1e47as, logic and their own averments, \u2014so rife in order to impose on the world\u2014 deserve not to be entertained.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The real philosophy of existence lies in the assertions which the \u015arutis make of the distinctive characteristics of (1) \u2018the experienced,\u2019 inherent in the nature of inert matter-stuff (<em>achit<\/em>), of (2) \u2018the experiencer,\u2019 inherent in the nature of soul-stuff (<em>chit<\/em>) and of (3) \u2018the Dictator,\u2019 inherent in the nature of Para-brahm (or the Supreme Spirit). Some of the \u015arutis which so declare are :\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018From this (<em>matter<\/em>), the Charmer (<em>M\u0101y\u012b<\/em>) creates this Kosmos; in which another (soul) is by (His) magic power confined\u2019.[3. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: IV-9: &#8216;Asm\u0101n M\u0101y\u012b s\u1e5bijate vi\u015bvam etat tasmim\u015b-chh-\u0101nyo m\u0101yay\u0101 sanniruddha\u1e25&#8217;.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Know the magic power (<em>m\u0101y\u0101<\/em>) to be verily matter (<em>prak\u1e5biti<\/em>)) as for the Charmer, He is the Great Lord\u2019.[4. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: IV-10 &#8216;M\u0101y\u0101ntu prak\u1e5bitim vidy\u0101n M\u0101yinam tu Mahe\u015bvaram&#8217;.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The perishable (<em>kshara<\/em>) is matter (<em>pradh\u0101na<\/em>), the imperishable (<em>akshara<\/em>) is the immortal enjoyer (the soul) and the Lord (God) alone, rules (both) matter and soul\u2019.[5. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: I-10: &#8216;Ksharam pradh\u0101nam am\u1e5bitaksharam har\u1e25, kshar\u0101tm\u0101n\u0101v \u012b\u015b\u0101te Deva Eka\u1e25&#8217;.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Here, <em>amrit-\u0101ksharam hara\u1e25<\/em>, stands for the enjoyer <em>viz<\/em>: the soul. The soul is called <em>hara\u1e25<\/em>, because it is he who is capable of seizing (= <em>harati<\/em>) on matter \u2014the enjoyed\u2014 as enjoyer thereof).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018He (God) is the Cause, is the Lord of the lord of the (bodily) organs (= Lord of the soul); to Him there is no other Lord Progenitor above[6. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: VI-2: &#8216;Sa k\u0101ra\u1e47am kara\u1e47\u0101dhip\u0101dhipo, na ch-\u0101sya ka\u015bchit janit\u0101, na ch-\u0101dhipa\u1e25&#8217;.]; \u2014He is the Master of matter (<em>pradh\u0101na<\/em>) and soul (<em>kshetraj\u00f1a<\/em>); He is the Lord of qualities.[7. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: &#8216;Pradh\u0101na-kshetraj\u00f1a-patir gu\u1e47e\u015ba\u1e25.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The Master of the Kosmos, the Lord of the soul, the Eternal, the Blessed, the Unfailing\u2019.[8. <em>Tait: N\u0101ra: Up:<\/em> XI-I; &#8216;Patimvi\u015bvas-\u0101tme\u015bvara \u015b\u0101\u015bvatam \u015bivam achyutam.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The Knower (God), the not-Knower (soul) are two; both are unborn; the One is Lord, the other is non-lord.\u2019[9. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: I-9: &#8216;J\u00f1\u0101`jnau dv\u0101v-aj\u0101v-i\u015ban\u012b\u015bau.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The eternal (God) of the eternals (souls), the Intelligent of the intelligsnts, the One above the many,\u2014Who grants desires\u2019.[10. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: VI-13: and <em>Ka\u1e6dh Up:<\/em> V-13; nityonity\u0101n\u0101m etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Knowing the experiencer (soul), the experienced (matter) and the Dictator (God) etc.'[11. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: i-12: &#8216;Bhokt\u0101 bhogyam Prerit\u0101ram etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Knowing the soul and the Guide as distinct, and then by serving Him, he (the soul) reaps immortality from Him.\u2019[12. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: i-6: &#8216;P\u1e5bithag \u0101tm\u0101nam Prerit\u0101ram etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Of them, the other (soul) eats of the ripe fruit of karma (<em>sv\u0101du pippalam<\/em>), but the other (God) eats not and shines everywhere.\u2019[13. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: IV-6, and <em>Mu\u1e47\u1e0d Up<\/em>: iii-I-I; &#8216;Tayor anya\u1e25 pippalam sv\u0101dvatti etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Verily one unborn (bound soul) lovingly tastes of the one unborn (matter)\u2014 red (=light=fluids), white(=water= liquids) and black (=food=solids), \u2014and the latter (matter) begets, in answer to his wishes (<em>sar\u016bp\u0101m<\/em>), manifold progeny; and one unborn (freed soul), discards her (matter) after tasting of her delights.\u2019[14. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: <em>Tait: N\u0101r\u0101:<\/em> x-5. &#8216;Aj\u0101m ek\u0101m lohita-\u015bukla-k\u1e5bishn\u0101m etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018This earth (=matter =<em>gau\u1e25<\/em>) is beginningless, endless, is the mother having all creatures in its womb.\u2019[15. <em>Mantra or M\u0101ntrika: Up:<\/em> I &#8216;Gaur an\u0101dyantavat\u012b s\u0101 etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Dwelling on the same tree (with the Supreme Soul) the deluded soul (the individual soul), immersed (in the relations of the world) is grieved without having a Lord; but when it sees the other, the Lord \u2014the Lovingly Worshippable, the Different (from all wordly relations)\u2014 and His glory, then does its (soul\u2019s) grief cease\u2019[16. <em>\u015avet. Up<\/em>: IV-7: <em>Mu\u1e47d: Up:<\/em> &#8216;Sam\u0101ne v\u1e5bishe purusho nimagno etc.&#8217;] etc., <em>ad libitum<\/em>. Also Stanzas in the G\u012bt\u0101 itself, such as those that follow, are <em>ad rem<\/em>. For example:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;., and ahank\u0101ra; thus constituting My eight fold differentiated Nature (prak\u1e5biti=matter)\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/7-4-original\/\">VII-4<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018But this is inferior; know My other Nature, superior \u2014the J\u012bva (=soul)\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/7-5-original\/\">VII-5<\/a>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018All creatures, Kaunteya! go into My Nature (=matter), at the end of a Kalpa. Again do I emit them at the beginning of a Kalpa.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/9-7-original\/\">IX-7<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Again and again do I, resorting to My Nature, emit all this sum of beings, lying helpless in the power of Nature.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/9-8-original\/\">IX-8<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018By Me, the Superintendent, (it) begets all mutables and immutables. Indeed is this the reason, Kaunteya! that the Kosmos turns.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/9-10-original\/\">IX-10<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Nature as well as Spirit, know, are both beginningless.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-19-original\/\">XIII-19<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The vast brahm (=matter! is My womb, into which I sow the germ (=soul). Thence comes, Bh\u0101rata! the birth of all beings.\u2019 (<em>Gi:<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/14-3-original\/\">XIV-3<\/a>); and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The meaning of the last quoted verse is :<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The womb (or source or cause) of the Kosmos, this vast <em>extended<\/em> (=matter-stuff) is Mine, called prak\u1e5biti (=substance), the subtle of the elements, the inert thing (<em>achit<\/em>). Into this, I unite the embryonic germ called the <em>chetana<\/em> (or <em>chit<\/em>=the conscious entity). Thereafter, from this compound alone of animate and inanimate substances \u2014created by My will\u2014 all creatures, from <em>deva<\/em> down to a tree, confined in matter (<em>achit<\/em>), are produced.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The term <em>brahma<\/em> as signifying this primal rudiment of elements (= root-matter) is evident from the \u015aruti:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018From Him (His will), this <em>brahma<\/em> (=unmanifested Kosmos) and the \u2018name-form-food\u2019 (=manifested Kosmos), are born.\u2019[17. <em>Mu\u1e47\u1e0d: Up:<\/em> I-I-9: &#8216;Tasm\u0101d etat brahma&#8217;, etc.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Similarly, \u015arutis <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/asseverate#Verb\">asseverate<\/a> that the Intelligents (<em>chit<\/em>) and non-Intelligents (<em>achit<\/em>), in all conditions and existing in the relation of \u2018experiencer\u2019 and \u2018the experienced,\u2019 constitute the body of the Supreme Spirit, and subject to His Will stand to him in indissoluble attributive relation; and that the Supreme Spirit is their Soul. (In other words, God is the Subject of the matter-and-soul Predicates). Some of the \u015arutis are quoted below for reference:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who seated in the earth, Who is the Interior of the earth; Whom earth knows not; to Whom earth is body; Who in the inside of the earth rules; He is your Soul, Inner Ruler, Immortal.\u2019[18. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> v-7-3: &#8216;Ya\u1e25 p\u1e5bithivy\u0101m tish\u1e6dhan etc.&#8217;]. Commencing thus, the \u015aruti closes by saying:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who seated in the soul; Who is the Interior of the soul; Whom the soul knows not; to Whom the soul is body; Who in the inside of the soul rules; He is your Soul, Inner Ruler, Immortal.\u2019[19. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> v-7-22: &#8216;Ya \u0101tmani tishthan etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another Upanishat, also commencing by declaring:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who, moving in the interior of the earth; to Whom earth is body; Whom the earth knows not,\u2019[20. <em>Sub\u0101: Up: vii.<\/em> &#8216;Ya\u1e25 p\u1e5bithiv\u012bm antare sa\u00f1charan etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who, moving in the interior of akshara (=soul), to Whom, akshara is body; whom akshara knows.not,\u2019[21. <em>Sub\u0101: Up: vii.<\/em> &#8216;Yo`kharam antare sa\u00f1charan etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who, moving in the interior of m\u1e5bityu (=root-matter) to whom m\u1e5bityu is body; whom m\u1e5bityu knows not,\u2019[22. <em>Sub\u0101: Up: vii.<\/em> &#8216;Yo m\u1e5bityum antare sa\u00f1charan etc.&#8217;] etc., finishes up by saying:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018He is the Inner Soul of all beings, the Sinless, the Divine, the only Lord, N\u0101r\u0101ya\u1e47a.\u2019[23. <em>Sub\u0101: Up: vii.<\/em> &#8216;Esha sarva-bh\u016bt-\u0101ntar-\u0101tma Divyo Deva Eko N\u0101r\u0101ya\u1e47a\u1e25.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(The term m\u1e5bityu in the above quoted Upanishat, connotes the subtle state of the inanimate (<em>achit<\/em>) substance, known by the appellation of <em>tamas<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the same Upanishat again, it is further stated:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018The unmanifest (<em>avyakta<\/em>) merges into the imperishable (<em>akshara<\/em>) and akshara into <em>tamas<\/em>\u2019[24. <em>Sub\u0101: Up: ii.<\/em> &#8216;Avyaktam akshara etc.&#8217;] and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Elsewhere also it is asserted thus:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Penetrating within, the Ruler of creatures, the all-Soul.\u2019[25. <em>Tait: \u0100ra\u1e47:<\/em> iii-10. &#8216;Anta\u1e25 pravishta\u015b \u015b\u0101st\u0101 jan\u0101n\u0101m etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Similarly, there are \u015arutis which undertake to explicitly impress the truth that the Supreme Spirit alone is the Subject, predicated by the compound body of sentient and insentient elements existing in all conditions; and that He alone is existent as the potential as well as the actual Kosmos. Some of them are cited here:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018This Sat (=existence=God) alone, O Somya (= amiable disciple), was in the beginning, the One Only, the Secondless[26. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> vi-2-1. &#8216;Sad eva Somya etc.&#8217;]&#8230;&#8230;\u2018That willed: &#8220;May I be many!\u201d &#8220;May I multiply.\u201d It created light (=tejas).\u2019[27. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> vi-2-3. &#8216;Tad aikshata bahu sy\u0101m etc.&#8217;] So begins one \u015aruti, and closes thus:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018In Sat (=Existence) O Somya! has all this offspring (creation) its Root, Sat is its Support, and Sat is its Rest.\u2019[28. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> vi-8-6. &#8216;San-m\u016bl\u0101s Somy em\u0101s sarv\u0101\u1e25 etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018All this (=the real Kosmos) is ensouled by It (Sat): That is true; That is the Soul; That, O \u015avetaketu! thou art.\u2019[29. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> vi-8-7. &#8216;Aitad \u0101tmyam idam sarvam etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In another place, similarly, beginning with:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cHe willed: \u2018May I be manifold!\u2019, \u2018May I procreate\u2019 etc.\u201d So did He meditate; meditating, He created all this,\u2019[30. <em>Tait: \u0100ra\u1e47:<\/em> ii-6-2. &#8216;So`k\u0101mayata bahusy\u0101m etc.&#8217;] closes by stating:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Both the constant (=<em>satyam<\/em> =soul) and the variant (=<em>an\u1e5bitam<\/em>=matter) became the Truth (=<em>Satyam<\/em>=God).\u2019[31. <em>Tait: \u0100ra\u1e47:<\/em> ii-6-3. &#8216;Satya\u00f1 ch\u0101n\u1e5bita\u00f1 cha.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The above passage confirms what, in another Upanishat (Chh\u0101ndogya), is sung in the same strain viz:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018<em>Hanta<\/em>! with this life-soul (=<em>j\u012bvena \u0101tman\u0101<\/em>=<em>j\u012bv\u0101tman\u0101<\/em>), do I interpenetrate these three devatas (=material principles: fire-water-earth), and manufacture names and forms;\u2019[32. <em>Chh: Up: vi-3-2.<\/em> &#8216;Hanta`ham im\u0101s tisro devat\u0101 etc.&#8217;] showing the distinction in essence subsisting between the three <em>substantia<\/em>, <em>viz<\/em>: <em>chit<\/em> (=soul), <em>achit<\/em> (=matter) and <em>\u012a\u015bvara<\/em> (=God).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Taittir\u012bya-Upanishat itself declares likewise: <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018After creating it (=the composite Kosmos of <em>chit<\/em> and <em>achit<\/em>), He (God) entered into it; and entering it, became both the non-mutatory (=Soul) and the mutatory (=matter) &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;, the (&#8216;one&#8217;) conscious, the (other) unconscious; the (one) constant, the (other) variable \u2014became the Truth (=God).\u2019[33. <em>Tait: Up:<\/em> II-6-2. &#8216;Tat s\u1e5bishtv\u0101 etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From the agreement in sense between the Chh\u0101ndogya-text viz:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018With this life-soul (=<em>j\u012bv\u0101tma<\/em>) do I enter into (these three devatas)\u2019[34. <em>Chh: Up: vi-3-2.<\/em> &#8216;Hanta`ham im\u0101s tisro devat\u0101 etc.&#8217;] etc. and the Taittir\u012bya-text: viz.,<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018(He), entering it, became both the changeless (=soul) and the changeful (=matter) &#8230;&#8230;.. the conscious and the unconscious[35. <em>Tait: Up:<\/em> II-6-2. &#8216;Tat s\u1e5bishtv\u0101 etc.&#8217;]\u2019 etc; as proving the ensoulment of j\u012bva (soul) by Brahm (God), it is seen that the principle intended to be established throughout is the principle of Immanent Co-existence as in the relation of soul and body.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The manufacturing of names and forms is of this (the aforesaid) description; which is further confirmed by another Upanishat also:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Whereas this verily was (before) unfashioned (<em>avy\u0101k\u1e5bitam<\/em>), and which (He now) fashioned into names and forms\u2019[36. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> iii-4-7 &#8216;Taddhedam ta\u1e5bhi etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hence, since the Supreme Spirit alone, with <em>chit<\/em> and <em>achit<\/em> correlated to Him as body, is the One Principle, the Cause, \u2014when <em>chit<\/em> and <em>achit<\/em> are in <em>subtle<\/em> condition,\u2014 and the Effect, \u2014when <em>chit<\/em> and <em>achit<\/em> are in <em>manifested<\/em> condition. Hence, admitting the identity of Cause and Effect, our position \u2018that knowledge of Cause is knowledge of Effect\u2019 <em><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/ergo#Conjunction\">ergo<\/a><\/em>, \u2018that knowledge of the One is the knowledge of all,\u2019 is tenable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the text: \u2018<em>Hanta<\/em>! with this life-soul (=<em>j\u012bv\u0101tma<\/em>), do I enter into these three devatas, and make names and forms,\u2019[37. <em>Chh: Up: vi-3-2.<\/em> &#8216;Hanta`ham im\u0101s tisro devat\u0101 etc.&#8217;] the expression \u2018three devatas\u2019 indicate all <em>achit<\/em>-substance <em>en masse<\/em>, and that fashioning \u2018names and forms\u2019 is by the medium of life (jiva=soul), the soul of the latter being God Himself. From this it is evident that all names which are sound-symbols do all have reference to the Supreme-Soul, adjectivated by matter and soul. Hence the Rule of the identity of substance with its adjuncts finds its primary application in that terms signifying the Supreme Spirit in His causal mode, have reference to terms signifying his mode as effect.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hence since Brahm Itself is the Cause, with soul and matter as Its modes in subtle state, and Brahm Itself the Effect with soul and matter as Its modes in gross state, Brahm may be said to be the Material Cause of the Kosmos. Though Brahm is the Material Cause, that Cause is the Compound (Brahm), and hence no intermingling <em>in their essences<\/em>, of the triune elements: soul, matter and Brahm, need be supposed. Our assertion therefore that Brahm is the Material Cause of the Kosmos is most tenable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As in the case of a colored cloth, the material cause of which, say, is the combination of white, black and red threads, \u2014though the cloth is a single substance considered as a whole, yet the qualities, whiteness etc., are confined to just those parts of the whole, where white threads etc., may happen to occur, so, when the compound of matter, soul and God is declared to be the Material Cause, yet in the Effect of that Cause, viz: the Kosmos, there is no confusion of the distinctive characteristics of \u2018the experiencer,\u2019 \u2018the experienced\u2019 and \u2018 Director\u2019 which severally pertain to the three distinctive principles, \u2014combining to produce a kosmic effect\u2014 of matter, soul and God. But there is a difference, that in the case of the cloth \u2014cited as analogy\u2014 the several (colored) threads are capable of being separated, whereas since matter and soul in every and any condition, ever constitute the body of the Supreme Spirit, it is a case where with the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/indiscerpible#English\">indiscerptible<\/a> <em>attributive<\/em> character of matter and soul and <em>substantive<\/em> character of God, it is a Compound Unity. Hence the Supreme Purusha alone so adjectivated by matter and soul, is both the Cause and the Effect; and Supreme Purusha alone is thus He, Whom every verbal symbol ultimately connotes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As for the differences in the components of this compound, and their non-interchangeable character, the analogy (of the cloth) holds good.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When the case stands thus, it is evident that though Parabrahm enters into the effect, \u2014since there is no transformation of His essential nature therein, there is no transmutation of His <em>substantial<\/em> character.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That He is Effect is tenable by reason of His being the Soul of the effect, for what is effect but a change of mode?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The contention of \u2018Brahm devoid of qualities\u2019 (=<em>nirgu\u1e47a-v\u0101da<\/em>), is justified when it is taken to mean that Brahm is devoid of <em>sinful<\/em> qualities. (It means that when for example Brahm is said to be sin-<em>less<\/em> it does not necessarily follow that He has <em>no virtues<\/em> or <em>no attributes<\/em> whatever). For, certain \u015aruti passages declare:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018(He is) destitute of sin, of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/decrepitude\">decrepitude<\/a>, of death, of affliction, of hunger, of thirst\u2019[38. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> VIII-I-5. &#8216;Apahata-p\u0101pm\u0101 etc.&#8217;]. After thus <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/oppugn#Verb\">oppugning<\/a> imperfections (or sinful qualities) to Brahm, the \u015aruti immediately next declares:\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018(He is) the Fulfilled of desires (=All-sufficient or Self-sufficient), the Possessed of Infallible will\u2019[39. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> VIII-1-5. &#8216;Satya k\u0101m\u0101s satya-sa\u1e47kalpa\u1e25 etc.&#8217;] etc., thus ascribing virtues (or good qualities) to Brahm; and establishes affirmatively here what elsewhere (in the \u015arutis) was generally negatively established that \u2018devoid of qualities\u2019 means the \u2018negation of <em>evil<\/em> qualities\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Next, the controversy \u2018that Brahm\u2019s nature is mere consciousness (not conscious entity)\u2019 becomes <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/intelligible#Adjective\">intelligible<\/a> on the ground that Brahm Who is Omniscient, Omnipotent, Opposed to vices and Endowed with Virtues etc., can be aptly defined by the fact of his being endowed with the primary attribute of consciousness, chiefly characterizing Him, the Self-Illuminated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u015arutis such as: \u2018Who is Omniscient and All-wise\u2019[40. <em>Mund: Up:<\/em> II-2-7. &#8216;Yas sarvaj\u00f1as etc.&#8217;];<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018It is heard that His Transcendant Power is manifold, and His natural (attributes of) Wisdom, Energy, Work etc.\u2019[41. <em>\u015avet: Up:<\/em> IV-8. &#8216;Par\u0101`sya \u015bakti\u1e25 etc.&#8217;] \u2018Oh (disciple)! By what is the All Knower to be Known?\u2019[42. <em>Bri: Up:<\/em> IV-4-14. &#8216;Vij\u1e47\u0101t\u0101ramare etc.&#8217;] etc., proclaim Him as the Wise or the Conscious (Being); etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u015arutis such as:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018(He is) Truth, Wisdom\u2019 etc.[43. <em>Tait: Up:<\/em> II-I-1. &#8216;Satyam j\u00f1\u0101nam etc.&#8217;], proclaim His being essentially Wise (etc), inasmuch as He is definable as permeated by Wisdom (or Knowledge or Consciousness), and as being essentially Self-Effulgent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u015arutis such as:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cHe willed: \u2018May I be manifold,\u2019\u201d[44. <em>Tait: Up:<\/em> II-6-2. &#8216;So`k\u0101mayata etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cHe contemplated: \u2018May I be many,\u2019\u201d[45. <em>Chh: Up:<\/em> VI-2-3. &#8216;Tad-aikshata etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018He fashioned it into names and forms;\u2019[46. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> III-4-7. &#8216;Tann\u0101ma-r\u016bp\u0101bhy\u0101m etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Oh (disciple)! When, indeed, the Spirit is seen, is heard, is meditated, is understood, all this becomes known;\u2019[47. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-5-6. &#8216;\u0100tmani khalv-are etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018All that is to be rejected where all is seen save \u0100tma;\u2019[48. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-5-6. &#8216;Sarvam tam par\u0101d\u0101t etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018What is Rig-veda but verily the breathings of this Great Being;\u2019[49. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-5-11. &#8216;Tasya hav\u0101 etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show that Brahm alone is, by His Self-will, existent in the forms of movable and immovable (Objects).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Again, that manifold existence without Brahm as Soul is an unreality, \u2014(<em>i.e.<\/em> in other words, any Multeity that could be supposed to exist without the Unity (Brahm) is a non-entity, or that anything could have a <em>self-existence independent<\/em> of Brahm),\u2014 is the declaration of such \u015arutis as:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Who perceives Here (in Brahm) the least diversity, deserves the death of death (=doom of sams\u0101ra)\u2019;[50. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> IV-4-19 and <em>Ka\u1e6dh Up:<\/em> IV-10-11. &#8216;M\u1e5bityos sa m\u1e5bityum etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Not Here (in Brahm) is the least diversity,\u2019[51. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-4-19 and <em>Ka\u1e6dh Up:<\/em> IV-10-11. &#8216;Neha n\u0101n\u0101`sti etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018Where it may appear to be duality;\u2019[52. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-5-15. &#8216;Yatra hi dvaitam etc.&#8217;]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018That as other, the other sees; but where to him all is Soul, who (else) is by what (else) seen ?\u2019[53. <em>B\u1e5bi: Up:<\/em> VI-5-15. &#8216;Tad itara itaram etc.&#8217;]; etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nor is the multiplicity of modes of Brahm, asserted by such \u015arutis, as: \u2018May I be many!, may I procreate!\u2019[54. <em>Chh. Up:<\/em> VI-2-3. &#8216;Bahu sy\u0101m praj\u0101yeya etc.&#8217;] \u2014showing the assumption by Brahm, by His own will of many names and forms,- denied; for that such is the case has been established at the commencement itself of the \u015aruti passages, in the midst of which occurs the apparent contrary statement : \u2018But where to him all is Soul,\u2019 etc,[55. <em>B\u1e5bi. Up:<\/em> VI-5-15. &#8216;Yatra tvasya etc.&#8217;] those passages being: \u2018All that is to be rejected where all is seen save \u0100tma\u2019[56. <em>B\u1e5bi. Up:<\/em> VI-5-7. &#8216;Sarvam tam par\u0101d\u0101t etc.&#8217;] \u2018What is Rig-Veda but verily the breathings of this Great Being\u2019[57. <em>B\u1e5bi. Up:<\/em> VI-5-11. &#8216;Tasya hav\u0101 etasya etc.&#8217;] etc. Thus by the \u015arutis themselves we see established (1) the <em>essential<\/em> (or substantial) differences amongst the Categories of <em>chit<\/em>, <em>achit<\/em> and <em>\u012a\u015bvara<\/em> (or the soul, matter and God); (2) the attributive (or qualitative) differences amongst them; (3) the Law of Cause and Effect; (4) the Relativity of Cause and Effect, etc, and thus a harmony is established amongst all the \u015arutis by the \u015arutis themselves. Hence there is not the least room for entertaining such doctrines as those of \u2018Brahm-nescience\u2019[58. This is what is called the <em> Brahm-\u0101j\u00f1\u0101na-v\u0101da<\/em>; or Brahm seeming dual through ignorance. This is \u015aankara&#8217;s doctrine (Vide commentary: <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-12-original\/\">II.12. Bh: G\u012b:<\/a>], (<em>Brahm-aj\u00f1\u0101na-v\u0101da<\/em>) \u2018Brahm-difference due to limitations\u2019,[59. This is what is called <em>Aup\u0101dhika-brahma-bheda-v\u0101da<\/em>; or Brahm become dual on account of limiting conditions. This is Y\u0101dava-bhaskara doctrine (vide commentary to <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/2-12-original\/\">II.12<\/a>).] (<em>Aup\u0101dhika-brahma-bheda-v\u0101da<\/em>) and other similar tenets based on fallacy and opposed to the spirit of the \u015arutis; and hence let us take leave of further controversy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-3\">&gt;&gt; Chapter 13 verse 3<\/a><\/p>\n<p>archived in <a href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\">https:\/\/githa.koyil.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>pramEyam (goal) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/koyil.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">http:\/\/koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\npramANam (scriptures) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org\">http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\npramAthA (preceptors) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org\">http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org<\/a><br \/>\nSrIvaishNava education\/kids portal \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/pillai.koyil.org\/\">http:\/\/pillai.koyil.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SrI:\u00a0 SrImathE SatakOpAya nama:\u00a0 SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama:\u00a0 SrImath varavaramunayE nama: Chapter 13 &lt;&lt; Chapter 13 verse 1 SlOkam \u2013 Original kshEthragyam chApi mAm vidhdhi sarvakshEthrEshu bhAratha | kshEthrakshEthragyayOr gyAna\u1e41 yath tath gyAnam matham mama || word-by-word meaning bhAratha &#8211; Oh descendant of bharatha clan! sarva kshEthrEshu &#8211; in all bodies (such as celestial, human etc) &#8230; <a title=\"13.2 kshEthragyam chApi mAm vidhdhi\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/13-2\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about 13.2 kshEthragyam chApi mAm vidhdhi\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chapter-13","category-simple"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5262"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15487,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5262\/revisions\/15487"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/githa.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}